[1]李尚杰①,李必红①,盛廷强②,等.不同测试方法对射孔弹穿孔性能的评价[J].爆破器材,2018,47(02):61-64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2018.02.012]
　LI Shangjie,LI Bihong,SHENG Tingqiang,et al.Evaluation of Perforation Performances of the Shaped Charge by Different Methods[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2018,47(02):61-64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2018.02.012]
点击复制

不同测试方法对射孔弹穿孔性能的评价()
分享到：

《爆破器材》[ISSN:1001-8352/CN:32-1163/TJ]

卷:
47
期数:
2018年02
页码:
61-64
栏目:
安全与测试
出版日期:
2018-03-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation of Perforation Performances of the Shaped Charge by Different Methods
文章编号:
5212
作者:
李尚杰①；李必红①；盛廷强②；王喜①；赵云涛①
①西安物华巨能爆破器材有限责任公司（陕西西安，710061）
②中海油田服务股份有限公司(天津，300452)
Author(s):
LI Shangjie①;  LI Bihong①;  SHENG Tingqiang②;  WANG Xi①;  ZHAO Yuntao①
① Xi’an Wuhua Juneng Blasting Equipment Co., Ltd. (Shaanxi Xi’an, 710061)
② China Offshore Oilfield Services Ltd. (Tianjin, 300452)
关键词:
射孔弹; 评价方法; 性能
Keywords:
shaped charge;  evaluation methods;  performances
分类号:
TJ55；TJ410.4；TE257
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2018.02.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用地面模拟装枪穿钢靶试验、整枪穿环形混凝土靶试验和地面模拟装枪穿砂岩靶试验3种不同的测试方法评价一种114型射孔弹穿孔性能。结果表明：在射孔弹方案研制阶段，选择地面模拟装枪穿钢靶试验，试验成本较低，对优化穿深性能有指导意义；地面模拟装枪穿砂岩靶试验作为射孔弹研制后期的评价方法，贴合射孔弹对地层的射孔效能，对油气增产和射孔弹应用更具指导意义。
Abstract:
In this paper, perforating performance of a Type 114 shaped charge was evaluated by three different test methods which are ground simulating gun penetrating steel target test, full gun penetrating annular concrete target test and ground simulated gun penetrating sandstone target test. The results show that in the perforation program developing stage, test cost of choosing ground simulation penetrating steel target is low, and the optimal penetration depth has guiding significance considering the perforation of realistic use of the environment. Ground simulated gun loading sandstone target test is the evaluation method of the developed stage of perforating bullet, matching the perforating efficiency of the formation, which is of more guidance to the oil and gas production and the shaped charge application.

参考文献/References:

［1］赵龙，王博.石油天然气生产储运中安全管理策略研究［J］.化工管理,2015(22):135-136.
［2］彭旭,赵锴栋,陈敬民,等.气田内部集输多管敷设间距剖析［J］.天然气与石油,2014,32(2):13-15.
 PENG X,ZHAO K D,CHEN J M,et al.Study on spacing between multiple pipelines in gas field gathering and transportation system［J］.Natural Gas and Oil,2014,32 (2):13-15.
［3］马学海,许研新,董浩.并行油气管道保护措施研究［J］.石油工程建设,2010,36(6): 33-35.
MA X H,XU Y X,DONG H.Research on protection measures of parallel oil and gas pipelines ［J］.Petroleum Engineering Construction,2010，36(6):33-35.
［4］CHEN X H, FENG Q S, SHUI B Y, et al.The development and challenges of pipeline failure analysis in China［C］//Proceedings of the 7th International Pipeline Conference. Calgary,Alberta,Canada,2008.
［5］张超.水下炸礁工程浅点消除技术及有害效应研究［D］.武汉：武汉科技大学,2012.
ZHANG C.Study on the technology to clear up the shallow point and adverse effects of underwater reef blasting［D］.Wuhan:Wuhan University of Science and Technology,2012.
［6］朱海.林区、多年冻土区并行敷设管道间距及施工技术探讨［J］.油气田地面工程,2016,35(1):83-85. 
 ZHU H.Separation Distance and construction technology of parallel laid pipelines in the forest regions and permafrost regions［J］.Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering,2016,35 (1):83-85.
［7］马学海，许研新.静态爆破技术在并行管道施工中的应用［J］.石油工程建设,2011,37(1):34-36.
 MA X H,XU Y X.Application of static explosion technique in parallel pipeline construction ［J］.Petroleum Engineering Construction,2011,37(1):34-36.
［8］张黎明.中深孔台阶爆破振动对地下管道的影响研究［D］.贵阳：贵州大学,2015.
ZHANG L M.Research on effect of the mediumlength hole beach blasting vibration on underground pipelines［D］.Guiyang:Guizhou University,2015.
［9］戴联双，张海珊，孟国忠，等.在役油气管道周边爆破作业风险分析［J］.油气储运,2012, 31(11):801-803.
 DAI L S,ZHANG H S,MENG G Z,et al.Risk analysis of blasting operation around inservice oil and gas pipeline［J］.Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(11):801-803.
［10］曹海峰.城市地铁隧道掘进爆破对既有燃气管道的影响［J］.山西建筑,2016,42(2):171-172.
CAO H F.The influence of urban subway tunnel excavation blasting on existing gas pipeline［J］.Shanxi Architecture,2016,42(2):171-172.
［11］禹海涛,柳献,袁勇,等.地下墙施工爆破对既有隧道的振动测试与分析［J］.爆炸与冲击,2009,29（6）:566-572.
YU H T,LIU X,YUAN Y,et al.Monitoring and analysis of an existing tunnel vibration induced by blasting construction of diaphragm wall［J］. Explosion and Shock Waves,2009,29(6)：566-572.
［12］MATTA L.Experimental response of steel pipelines to close trench blasting［C］//Proceedings of the 11th International Pipeline Conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada,2016.
［13］张明.城市浅埋隧道衬砌结构抗爆特性数值模拟研究［D］.西安：西安科技大学，2009.
ZHANG M. Study on antiblasting numerical simulation of urban shallow-tunnel lining structure［D］.Xi’an:Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]赖康华,杜明章,雷新华,等.正交试验在粉末药型罩制造工艺参数研究中的应用[J].爆破器材,2010,39(06):34.
　LAI Kanghua,DU Mingzhang,LEI Xinhua,et al.Application of Orthogonal Design in Manufacturing Technological Parameters Study of Powder Liner[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2010,39(02):34.
[2]付代轩,雷新华,李云.射孔弹射孔未穿孔的原因分析[J].爆破器材,2012,41(04):37.
　FU Daixuan,LEI Xinhua,LI Yun.Analysis on the Puncherless Cause of Perforating Charge[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2012,41(02):37.
[3]张子敏①,许碧英①,阎峰②,等.活性金属药型罩射孔弹破甲试验研究[J].爆破器材,2013,42(04):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2013.04.013]
　ZHANG Zimin,XU Biying,YAN Feng,et al.Penetrating Test of Active Metal Charge Liner Perforating Bullet[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2013,42(02):53.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2013.04.013]
[4]吴焕龙.装药与药型罩分离对射孔弹穿深影响的规律研究[J].爆破器材,2014,43(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2014.01.008]
　WU Huanlong.Law Study on the Influence of Charging and Liner Separation to Penetration Depth of Perforating Charge[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2014,43(02):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2014.01.008]
[5]李尚杰,李必红,赵云涛,等.一种破片高回收率射孔弹壳体破碎特性的设计方法研究[J].爆破器材,2014,43(06):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2014.06.011]
　LI Shangjie,LI Bihong,ZHAO Yuntao,et al.Design Method of High Recovery of Fragments about Shell of Shaped[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2014,43(02):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2014.06.011]
[6]汪长栓①,王海洲②,李刚③,等.Stimstream等孔径深穿透射孔弹在页岩气井中的应用[J].爆破器材,2017,46(05):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2017.05.008]
　WANG Changshuan,WANG Haizhou,LI Gang,et al.Application of Stimstream Shaped Charge Providing Equal Aperture and Deep Penetration in Shale Gas Reservoir[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2017,46(02):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2017.05.008]
[7]赖康华,雷新华,赵世华,等.LLM-105炸药在超高温射孔弹中的应用[J].爆破器材,2018,47(03):42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2018.03.008]
　LAI Kanghua,LEI Xinhua,ZHAO Shihua,et al.Application of LLM-105 Explosive in Ultra-high Temperature Perforating Charge[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2018,47(02):42.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2018.03.008]
[8]李必红,李哲雨,李尚杰,等.活性粉末药型罩射孔弹穿孔性能试验研究[J].爆破器材,2020,49(01):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2020.01.009]
　LI Bihong,LI Zheyu,LI Shangjie,et al.Penetrating Performance Test of Shaped Charge with Active Powder Liner[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2020,49(02):45.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2020.01.009]
[9]陈星见①,柳军①②,罗杰①,等.射孔弹侵彻岩层及能量转化效率研究[J].爆破器材,2024,53(03):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2024.03.008]
　CHEN Xingjian,LIU Jun,LUO Jie,et al.Penetration of Perforation Charge into Rock Strata and Energy Conversion Efficiency of Jet[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2024,53(02):48.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2024.03.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2017-08-30
作者简介：李尚杰（1985－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事石油射孔弹的研究。E-mail:zbdx04081401@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-23