[1]孙苗①,李兴明①,吴立②.基于EP-CEEMDAN-PED的隧道扩挖爆破网络延时分析[J].爆破器材,2022,51(04):51-57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2022.04.009]
 SUN Miao,LI Xingming,WU Li.Network Delay Analysis in Tunnel Expansion Blasting Based on EP-CEEMDAN-PED[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2022,51(04):51-57.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2022.04.009]
点击复制

基于EP-CEEMDAN-PED的隧道扩挖爆破网络延时分析()
分享到:

《爆破器材》[ISSN:1001-8352/CN:32-1163/TJ]

卷:
51
期数:
2022年04
页码:
51-57
栏目:
爆破技术
出版日期:
2022-07-08

文章信息/Info

Title:
Network Delay Analysis in Tunnel Expansion Blasting Based on EP-CEEMDAN-PED
文章编号:
5666
作者:
孙苗李兴明吴立
①湖北国土资源职业学院环境与工程学院(湖北武汉,430090)
②中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院(湖北武汉,430074)
Author(s):
SUN Miao LI Xingming WU Li
①College of environment and Engineering, Hubei Land Resources Vocational College (Hubei Wuhan, 430090)
②Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (Hubei Wuhan, 430074)
关键词:
爆破地震波信号微差起爆经验模态分解固有模态函数
Keywords:
blasting seismic wave signal millisecond blasting empirical mode decomposition intrinsic mode function
分类号:
TD235.1; O382
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2022.04.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
经验模态分解(empirical mode decomposition, EMD)固有的端点效应和模态混淆导致其在进行爆破网络延时分析时出现不容忽视的误差。为了获得爆破现场实际网络延时,判断批次雷管的安全性,必须对EMD进行改进。通过对爆破地震波监测信号进行端点处理(endpoint processing, EP),改善EMD在处理信号实际端点时出现的端点突变现象,进而抑制EMD端点效应,提高固有模态函数(intrinsic mode function,IMF)的稳定性和精度。对EMD进行改进,得到自适应补充集合经验模态分解(complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise,CEEMDAN),抑制低频趋势项模态混淆,并结合排列熵检测(permutation entropy detection, PED)来控制高频模态混淆。得到的EP-CEEMDAN-PED算法能识别微差爆破实际延期时间,且能有效克服EMD固有的端点效应和模态混淆现象,结合干扰减振法,可计算实际隧道扩挖爆破合理减振微差时间为55.14~57.93 ms,对爆破振动控制具有重要的现实意义。
Abstract:
The inherent endpoint effect and modal confusion of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) lead to errors that can not be ignored in the analysis of blasting network delay. In order to obtain the actual network delay at the blasting site and judge the safety of batch detonators, EMD must be improved. Through endpoint processing (EP) of blasting seismic wave monitoring signal, the endpoint mutation phenomenon of EMD when processing the actual endpoint of signal was improved, so as to suppress the endpoint effect of EMD and improve the stability and accuracy of intrinsic mode function (IMF). The EMD was improved to obtain the complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) to suppress the modal confusion of low-frequency trend term, and combined with permutation entropy detection (PED) to control the high-frequency modal confusion. The obtained EP-CEEMDAN-PED algorithm can identify the actual delay time of millisecond blasting, and can effectively overcome the inherent endpoint effect and modal confusion of EMD. Combined with the interference damping method, the reasonable damping millisecond time of actual tunnel expansion blasting can be calculated as 55.14-57.93 ms, which is of great practical significance for blasting vibration control.

参考文献/References:

[1]张在晨, 林从谋, 李家盛, 等. 我国公路隧道改扩建技术发展现状及研究展望[J].隧道建设(中英文),2022,42(4):570-585.
ZHANG Z C, LIN C M, LI J S, et al. Development status and prospect of highway tunnel rehabilitation and expansion in China[J]. Tunnel Construction (Chinese and English), 2022,42(4):570-585.
[2]吴慧, 汪艮忠. 复杂环境下既有隧道扩挖爆破技术[J]. 工程爆破, 2019, 25(4): 39-44.
WU H, WANG Y Z. Expansion blasting technique of existing tunnel in complex environment[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2019, 25 (4):39-44.
[3]张亮, 孙新建, 孟佳. 基于CEEMD-HHT方法确定隧洞爆破网络实际延时时间[J]. 爆破, 2017, 34(1): 27-32.
ZHANG L, SUN X J, MENG J. CEEMDHHT method to identify real delay time in millisecond blasting[J]. Blasting, 2017, 34(1): 27-32.
[4]孙新建, 张亮, 孟佳. 基于EEMDHHT方法的隧洞爆破网路延时分析[J]. 工程爆破, 2016, 22(4): 7-10,27.
SUN X J, ZHANG L, MENG J. Delay time analysis of tunnel blasting network based on EEMD-HHT method[J]. Engineering Blasting, 2016, 22(4): 7-10,27.
[5]龚敏, 邱燚可可, 孟祥栋, 等. 基于HHT的雷管实际延时识别法在城市环境微差爆破中的应用[J].振动与冲击, 2015, 34(10): 206-212.
GONG M, QIU Y K K, MENG X D, et al. Identification method of detonator’s actual firing time delay based on HHT and its application in millisecond blasting under urban environment[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(10): 206-212.
[6]徐振洋, 杨军, 陈占扬. 高精度雷管逐孔起爆地震信号的精确时频分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(增刊2): 331-336.
XU Z Y, YANG J, CHEN Z Y. Precise time-frequency analysis on seismic signal by hole initiation using high-precision detonators[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2013, 38(Suppl.2): 331-336.
[7]田振农, 孟祥栋, 王国欣. 城区隧道电子雷管起爆错相减震机理分析[J].振动与冲击, 2012, 31(21): 108-111.
TIAN Z N, MENG X D, WANG G X. Mechanism analysis of fault-phase vibration reduction for tunnel blasting initiated by electronic detonators in city area[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(21): 108-111.
[8]李夕兵, 张义平, 刘志祥, 等. 爆破震动信号的小波分析与HHT变换[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(6): 528-535.
LI X B, ZHANG Y P, LIU Z X, et al. Wavelet analysis and Hilbert-Huang transform of blasting vibration signal[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 528-535.
[9]HUANG N E, SHEN Z, LONG S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 1998, 454(3): 903-995.
[10]孙苗.爆破地震波信号处理HHT改进算法及应用研究[D].武汉:中国地质大学(武汉),2021.
SUN M. Improved HHT algorithm for blasting seismic wave signal processing and its application[D].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences (Wuhan),2021.
[11]TORRES M E, COLOMINAS M A, SCHLOTTHAUER G, et al. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise[C]// Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Prague, Czech Republic: IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2011: 4144-4147.
[12]CHEN S J, SHANG P J, WU Y. Multivariate multiscale fractional order weighted permutation entropy of nonlinear time series [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 515: 217-231.
[13]李军, 李青. 基于CEEMDAN排列熵和泄漏积分ESN的中期电力负荷预测研究[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2015, 19(8): 71-79.
LI J, LI Q. Medium term electricity load forecasting based on CEEMDAN-permutation entropy and ESN with leaky integrator neurons [J]. Electric Machines and Control, 2015, 19(8): 71-79.
[14]郑近德, 程军圣, 杨宇. 改进的EEMD算法及其应用研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(21): 21-26.
ZHENG J D, CHENG J S, YANG Y. Modified EEMD algorithm and its applications [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(21): 21-26.
[15]郑旭, 郝志勇, 卢兆刚, 等. 基于MEEMD的内燃机机体活塞敲击激励与燃烧爆发激励分离研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(6): 109-113.
ZHENG X, HAO Z Y, LU Z G, et al. Separation of piston-slap and combustion shock excitations via MEEMD method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(6):109-113.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-10-27
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41672260)
第一作者:孙苗(1993-),女,博士,讲师,主要从事爆破地震波信号处理研究。E-mail:2357152544@qq.com
通信作者:吴立(1963-),男,教授,博导,主要从事岩土与爆破工程的研究。E-mail: lwu@cug.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-06