[1]彭泽森①,倪迪②,陶小钧②,等.隧道扩挖既有衬砌的爆破拆除[J].爆破器材,2019,48(06):48-54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2019.06.010]
 PENG Zesen,NI Di,TAO Xiaojun,et al.Blasting Demolition of Existing Lining in Tunnel Expansion Excavation[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2019,48(06):48-54.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2019.06.010]
点击复制

隧道扩挖既有衬砌的爆破拆除()
分享到:

《爆破器材》[ISSN:1001-8352/CN:32-1163/TJ]

卷:
48
期数:
2019年06
页码:
48-54
栏目:
爆破技术
出版日期:
2019-12-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Blasting Demolition of Existing Lining in Tunnel Expansion Excavation
文章编号:
5376
作者:
彭泽森倪迪陶小钧朱爱山
①中国地质大学(武汉)(湖北武汉,430074)
②台州市交通投资集团有限公司(浙江台州,318000)
③浙江省隧道工程集团有限公司(浙江杭州,310005)
Author(s):
PENG Zesen NI Di TAO XiaojunZHU Aishan
① China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (Hubei Wuhan, 430074)
② Taizhou Communications Investment Group (Zhejiang Taizhou, 318000)
③ Zhejiang Tunnel Engineering Group (Zhejiang Hangzhou,310005)
关键词:
隧道工程方案比选爆破拆除振动速度数值模拟
Keywords:
tunnel engineering scheme comparison blasting demolition vibration velocity numerical simulation
分类号:
U457+.6
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2019.06.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以浙江温岭楼山隧道扩挖工程为背景,采用ANSYS数值模拟软件对两种工法下隧道拱顶既有衬砌的爆破拆除方案进行对比,研究不同的爆破开挖方案对隧道周边岩土体及既有隧道产生的影响。其中,工法一对隧道I部分衬砌及上方I部分岩土体同时进行开挖;工法二则对上述两部分进行分部开挖。通过对两种工法下监测点的振动速度进行研究分析,并参考GB 6722—2014《爆破安全规程》,对比选出合适的爆破拆除方法。结果表明:两种工法左侧未开挖隧道的振动速度均低于安全标准;工法一的爆破振动速度相对较大,隧道右洞质点振动速度大于安全允许值;采用Matlab对右洞监测点的振动速度进行拟合,获得了爆破振动衰减规律。
Abstract:
Based on the project of expanding and digging Wenling Loushan Tunnel in Zhejiang, the blasting demolition schemes of existing lining of tunnel arch roof under two engineering options were compared by ANSYS numerical simulation software, and the influences of different blasting excavation schemes on surrounding rock and soil mass and existing tunnels were studied. In construction method 1, the lining of part I of the tunnel and the rock and soil mass of part I above the tunnel are excavated at the same time. In construction method 2, the above two parts are excavated by segments. Vibration velocity of monitoring points under the two construction methods were analyzed. According to Safty Regulations for Blasting (GB 6722—2014), it was concluded that blasting vibration velocities in the two construction methods meet the standard. Vibration velocity in construction method 1 is relatively large, and that of the particle point in the right hole of the tunnel using engineering method 1 is greater than the safety allowable value. Matlab was used to fit the vibration velocity of the monitoring point in the right hole, and the blasting vibration attenuation tendency was obtained.

参考文献/References:

[1]汪旭光.爆破设计与施工[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2011:201-203.
[2]谢先启,刘军,贾永胜,等.拆除爆破数值模拟研究进展[J].中国工程科学,2014,16(11):20-27.
XIE X Q, LIU J, JIA Y S, et al. Advances in numerical simulation of demolition blasting [J]. Engineering Sciences,2014,16(11):20-27.
[3]谢先启,贾永胜,姚颖康,等.复杂环境下城市超长高架桥精细爆破拆除关键技术研究[J].中国工程科学,2014,16(11):65-71,77.
XIE X Q, JIA Y S, YAO Y K, et al. Key technologies of precision demolition blasting of ultra-long urban viaduct in complicated surroundings [J]. Engineering Sciences, 2014, 16(11): 65-71, 77.
[4]李清,杨阳,杨仁树,等.基于MAT96本构模型的钢筋混凝土结构爆破拆除数值模拟[J].爆破器材,2015,44(1):41-45.
?LI Q, YANG Y, YANG R S, et al. The numerical simulation of reinforced concrete structure blasting based on MAT96 constitutive model [J]. Explosive Materials ,2015,44(1):41-45.
[5]季杉,王桂玲,谢伟平.高架桥爆破坍塌全过程数值模拟与分析[J].爆破,2014,31(4):76-81.
JI S, WANG G L, XIE W P. Analysis and numerical simulation of whole process of blasting and collapse of viaduct [J]. Blasting, 2014, 31(4): 76-81.
[6]费鸿禄,杨小庚,周健华,等.18层框架楼房定向爆破倒塌迟缓原因分析[J].爆破,2017,34(4):149-154, 174.
FEI H L, YANG X G, ZHOU J H, et al. Analysis of collapse delay causes of directional explosive demolition in 18 layers frame buildings [J]. Blasting, 2017, 34(4): 149-154, 174.
[7]谢先启,贾永胜,黄小武,等.17层框-剪结构大楼定向爆破拆除[J].爆破,2016,33(2):107-112.
XIE X Q, JIA Y S, HUANG X W, et al. Directional explosive demolition of 17-layer frame-shear structure building [J]. Blasting, 2016, 33(2): 107-112.
[8]朱正国,孙明路,朱永全,等.超小净距隧道爆破振动现场监测及动力响应分析研究[J].岩土力学,2012, 33(12):3747-3752,3759.
ZHU Z G, SUN M L, ZHU Y Q, et al. Field monitoring on blasting vibration and dynamic response of ultra-small spacing tunnels[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(12): 3747-3752,3759.
[9]姚勇,何川,晏启祥,等.董家山隧道小净距段爆破控制的数值模拟[J].岩土力学,2004,25(增 2):501-506.
YAO Y, HE C, YAN Q X, et al. Numerical simulation of blasting control for small clear distance zone of Dongjiashan Tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(Suppl. 2): 501-506.
[10]王春梅.小间距隧道爆破对既有隧道振动影响分析[J].爆破,2013,30(2):84-89.
WANG C M. Analysis of vibration influences of small spacing tunnel blasting on existing tunnel[J].Blasting,2013,30(2): 84-89.
[11]李云鹏,艾传志,韩常领,等.小间距隧道爆破开挖动力效应数值模拟研究[J].爆炸与冲击,2007,27(1):75-81.
LI Y P, AI C Z, HAN C L, et al. Study on dynamics effect caused by blasting construction by numerical simulation for tunnels with small spacing [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2007, 27(1): 75-81.
[12]王继槐,刘辉,颜东煌.小间距隧道爆破振动影响分析[J].中外公路,2012,32(3):268-271.
[13]李秀地,蒋树屏,刘元雪,等.小净距隧道扩建爆破动力响应数值模拟方法研究[J].地震工程学报,2014, 36(4):784-789.
LI X D, JIANG S P, LIU Y X, et al. Numerical simulation of blasting dynamic response of small spacing tunnel expansion[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2014, 36(4): 784-789.
[14]爆破安全规程:GB 6722—2014 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
Safety regulations for blasting:GB 6722—2014 [S].Beijing:China Standard Press,2014.
[15]杜峰,闫军,张学民,等.大跨度小净距隧道爆破振动影响数值模拟分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2017,14(3):568-574.
DU F, YAN J, ZHANG X M, et al. Numerical simulation of large span and small spacing neighborhood tunnel blasting vibration effect [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2017, 14(3): 568-574.

相似文献/References:

[1]李淮①,孙卫星①,宋鹏伟②,等.基于C型聚能管的聚能水压光面爆破技术原理及应用[J].爆破器材,2023,52(01):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2023.01.009]
 LI Huai,SUN Weixing,SONG Pengwei,et al.Principle and Application of Shaped Energy Water Pressure Smooth Blasting Technology Based on C-Shaped Energy-Concentrating Tube[J].EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS,2023,52(06):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2023.01.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-14
基金项目:浙江省交通运输厅科研计划项目(2018013);国家自然科学基金(41672260)
第一作者:彭泽森(1995-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事爆破技术相关的研究。E-mail:1774783464@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-04